Success Warrior: The Blog That Embraces ADHD

Are We Flogging a Red Herring?

So,

I was recently watching a video by The Last American Vagabond where one of the discussion points was the cycle thresholds being used when processing PCRs.  At one point, Ryan points out that he might be flogging a dead horse given how much time he was spending on the topic.  For those of us that have been researching this stuff since the spring of 2020, the answer would be yes.  However, more people are having their eyes opened each week and he is getting new subscribers and for those people, the answer might be no.  It's a difficult line to walk, trying not to bore long time listeners/independent researchers while trying to play catch up with new listeners.  The answer is relative to the listener and doesn't have a one size fits all answer.  The point is (look, now Ryan has me saying "the point is...") that he was spending a lot of time on the topic, he noticed it, and when he wondered if he was flogging a dead horse, I said "yep" and switched to listening to music while I did something else.

Later, I was listening to something on a different topic.  I can't remember who it was so I'm sorry to that person that I can't link to them.  There was a statement made that went something like this.  Arguing that torture is wrong because it doesn't result in getting accurate information is completely missing the point.  Torture is wrong because it's immoral, regardless of the validity of the information gained.  It's wrong because it's just wrong, period.  This wasn't new to me but hearing it at that moment, with Ryan's PCR discussion fresh on my mind, made me think back to my initial research into PCRs and wonder if we haven't gone off track a bit.

When the COVID-19 hoax was amping up, there was a lot of focus on "cases".  Not as much as there would be later in the year when the case-demic broke out (because there were no deaths to focus on) but enough to make me wonder, is PCR a valid COVID-19 test.  Here's how I saw it before I knew anything about cycle thresholds.

Is PCR a valid COVID-19 test?  

Is PCR a test?  No.  It's a process that makes copies of viral RNA.  This is telling, however, they have obviously adapted it so that it can give positive/negative results so I kept asking questions.

What does PCR replicate/amplify?  Viral RNA, debris left behind by viruses and bacterias.  Is COVID-19 a virus or bacteria?  No, it's a disease.  Therefore, it's factually impossible to use PCR as a COVID-19 test.

Maybe they are actually testing for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and have misnamed it as a COVID-19 test.  Does PCR identify which virus or bacteria left the viral RNA?  No, a different technique has to be applied to the amplified sample to identify it.  Has the SARS-CoV-2 protein been sequenced (aka identified)?  No.  So, even if PCR had the capability of identifying the responsible virus or bacteria, it wouldn't find SARS-CoV-2.  So, PCR is not a misnamed SARS-CoV-2 test.

It turns out that PCR is simply "a method widely used to rapidly make millions to billions of copies of a specific DNA sample, allowing scientists to take a very small sample of DNA and amplify it to a large enough amount to study in detail." (Wikipedia) and not a test or a COVID-19 test or a SARS-CoV-2 test.

This made me wonder if arguing that PCR was invalid as a COVID-19 test because they are using high cycle thresholds which are guaranteed to return extremely high numbers of false positives is completely missing the point.  Maybe PCR is invalid as a COVID-19 test because it doesn't actually test for COVID-19, regardless of cycle threshold.  Maybe using PCR as a "COVID-19" test is wrong because it's just the wrong tool, period.  Even if you lowered the cycle threshold down to 24 where a positive result would indicate that the person has a disease and is contagious, you'd have to do other tests to find out what disease the person actually had.

Historically, we see PCR being used as a "whooping cough test" that upended lives for 8 months.  When they used an actual whooping cough test, they found zero cases.  PCR was used as a "swine flu test" to fuel a fake pandemic where it turned out that there was, what, one confirmed case?  PCR amplifies viral RNA, which humans have in their bodies even when they are healthy.  Magnifying that RNA to a point where it can be detected and then claiming that it can only come from the disease flavor of the month is beyond disingenuous.  PCR does not do what officials are claiming that it does.  It's just the wrong tool.  You might as well stick a microscope up everyone's nose and if it comes out with snot on it, declare the person tested positive for COVID-19.  I'll leave it up to you to decide the intent and morality of knowingly using an incorrect medical tool to pronounce a diagnosis.

Rather than flogging a dead horse with our (because I've done it too) long discussions about cycle thresholds, maybe we are instead flogging a red herring.

COVID-19 Terminology

So,

I thought it might be useful, at least for myself, to create a brief overview of info I've gathered since the hoax began.  It didn't turn out to be very brief but it is relatively brief when you consider that I could probably write multiple blog posts on each topic below.  I thought that an easy way to get it all down and encourage myself to be brief would be to add info in bullet points by buzzword.

Note, this is a work in progress.  More bullets will be added and references will be added for all bullets except the few where I express my opinion.

Pandemic:

• The worldwide spread of a new disease (1)
• In May 2009, the WHO removed the requirement that the disease cause "enormous numbers of death and illness" (2)
• Redefining the term was done in preparation for the swine flu hoax that began later that year
• This means that any cold and flu season can be declared as a pandemic if accompanied by a novel coronavirus declaration
• Declaring a pandemic makes rulers believe they have permission to act as dictators, trampling on human rights as they see fit

COVID-19:

• An upper respiratory disease that presents with flu symptoms
• Reportedly caused by a virus known as SARS-CoV-2 (pronounced sars coh vee 2 or sars kahv 2)
• There is a 99.97% chance of surviving if you catch COVID-19
• Those odds go up the healthier and younger you are and go down the more comorbidities you have and the old you are
• The average age of people killed around the world by COVID-19 is life expectancy plus two years
• If life expectancy in your county is 80, the average age of people killed by COVID-19 is 82

SARS-CoV-2:

• A coronavirus whose protein structure has not been identified yet
• Thousands of possible computer generated models exist, one of which might be SARS-CoV-2
• SARS-CoV-2 like all coronaviruses (which also cause colds and flus) are aerosolized viruses
• SARS-CoV-2 is a virus and COVID-19 is a disease caused by the virus in the same way that flus are caused by flu viruses

Koch's Postulates

• A proposed means of identifying a virus comprised of four postulates
• More to come

Covid (applicable to the United States and countries with similar reporting processes)

• A generic term denoting an upper respiratory disease with flu symptoms
• The actual disease may be pneumonia, influenza, or a COVID (COVID-19, COVID-21, etc.)
• Reported pneumonia, influenza, and COVID cases, known as PIC cases are kept as a single stat by the CDC
• PIC cases are then reported as covid cases by unscrupulous government officials and media outlets
• Most PIC cases are influenza except in locations with strict mask mandates, where bacterial pneumonia may be the predominate covid disease

Mask:

• A clothing accessory or facial fashion piece, made of any material that covers the mouth and nose of the wearer
• Many places accept a plastic shield (aka sneeze guard) affixed to a hat or band
• They have been proven time and again to be statistically insignificant at preventing the spread of aerosolized viruses
• This is easy to see while the weather is cold.  If you can see the fog of your breath going through your mask or venting out gaps between the mask and your face, your mask is not stopping you from spreading or preventing you from being infected by an aerosolized virus
• Masks are referred to as "talismans" by health agencies.  They don't offer actual protection but act as your lucky rabbit's foot for COVID-19
• Mask wearing causes hypoxia (decreased oxygen intake) and hypercapnia (increased CO2 intake)
• Symptoms of hypoxia are headaches, fatigue, trouble concentrating, and unconsciousness (which is why it's all too obvious that school kids should wear masks)
• Hypoxia reduces immunity, making it more likely to catch a disease and more likely that the effects of the disease will be more serious
• Repeated hypoxia episodes may increase the occurrence of heart attacks and strokes
• Prolonged mask wearing causes bacterial pneumonia, which is why there is nearly always an increase in PIC cases (reported as a new covid outbreak) within 12 weeks of mask mandates
• Bacterial pneumonia is contagious (Isn't that ironic?  The people who are wearing the masks are the health threat to society)
• Mask wearing increases the concentration of any airborne disease the wearer may have because they breath in the waste products their body is trying to expel
• Mask wearing causes "mask mouth"
• Mask mouth can cause bad breath, gum disease, and cavities and can lead to heart attacks and strokes
• Masks also have detrimental psychological affects, especially for children (I'll add to this as I research deeper into the topic or receive sourced material from readers)

COVID Test

• There is no such thing
• This is not surprising since the structure of the virus has not been identified yet
• Most people are probably referring to a PCR when they say "COVID test"

PCR

• Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a method or process for duplicating viral RNA millions of times making the sample large enough to be studied by researchers
• PCR is not a test
• Saying "PCR Test" is like saying "microscope test".  Microscopes make it possible to study incredibly small objects and so do PCRs
• PCR detects all viral RNA, including those left by cold and flu coronaviruses and bacterial infections
• A positive result from a PCR means that some type of viral RNA was found but doesn't determine what left the viral RNA behind
• PCRs were used as a "swine flu test" to create fictitious "cases" to create the illusion of a pandemic
• Because of this, PCRs should never be relied upon as the sole diagnostic tool or be used on asymptomatic people

Cycle Threshold (CT)

• Cycle threshold is a measure of how many times the viral RNA was duplicated in the PCR
• A positive PCR result using CT of 24 or less would show that there is a contagious virus
• The type of virus would not be known without further research, again demonstrating that PCR is not a COVID test
• Any result using a CT of 33 or greater would show dead viral debris 
• Using a CT of 45 will result in about 95% false positives
• Typically, labs have been using CTs of 37, 40, 45, and higher but there is talk of bringing them down as of 1/20/2021
• If I were more cynical and didn't have complete faith in my buddy Tony, who plays a doctor on TV, I would say that high CTs were used initially to ensure that nearly everyone who was tested had a positive result giving the illusion that there was a pandemic.  And that, now, if the CTs are lowered, the reduced number of cases (due to fewer false positives) will be sold to the uninformed as a double whammy "proving" that experimental COVID therapeutics work and that an incoming president with a poor image is actually a hero.  Lucky for me, I know that felonious Fauci would never lie to me.  We're all safe with him at the helm.  The only way we could be safer is if he was a computer programmer.

Vaccine

• A solution that includes a weakened or dead virus or part of the virus's structure that is introduced into a person's body, usually by injection
• The theory is that this will cause the body to create antibodies to the virus making the person immune to the virus

COVID Vaccine

• There is no such thing
• This is not surprising since the structure of the virus has not been identified yet
• Attempts at creating coronavirus vaccines have been going on for decades but all attempts have ended in disaster
• All previous attempts have created pathogenic priming/antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) in test subjects
• Most people are probably referring to an experimental COVID therapeutic when they say "COVID vaccine"

Antibody-dependent Enhancement (ADE)

• Initially, test subjects appear to create strong antibodies to the virus making it appear that they will be immune
• When exposed to the actual virus though, their bodies take on aspects of an auto immune disease
• This makes the effects of the disease much, much worse often resulting in death

Experimental COVID Therapeutic (ECT)

• ECTs were not designed to give recipients immunity from SARS-CoV-2, which is why they are not vaccines
• ECTs were designed to reduce the flu symptoms in people who contracted COVID-19
• This means they would be better described as experimental cold remedies, maybe experimental preemptive cold remedies
• Currently, you might take something like Nyquil if you get a flu/covid
• If the ECT is effective, your body creates the benefits of Nyquil automatically
• Early tests have shown ECTs to be 19-26% effective at reducing COVID-19 symptoms
• Rather than injecting people with parts of the virus, ECTs use an experimental technique called Messenger RNA (mRNA)
• One result of this combination of experimental technology and ECTs not being vaccines has been the wide variety of names being used to refer to it
• Examples of these names include things like: ECT, experimental genetic modifying injection, experimental RNA "vaccine", and others (I'll add to the list as I come across them)
• Most of these names are so long that ECTs are being referred to more and more as "The Jab"
• Everyone who gets the jab becomes a test subject in the experiment, which is expected to last until at least 2023
• If you are injured by an ECT, you cannot sue the drug company for damages because calling their experimental technology a "vaccine" gives them magic immunity from lawsuits

Messenger RNA (mRNA)

• ECTs use mRNA to tell cells in the body to create part of a coronavirus spike protein
• Then the body is supposed to create the antibodies to fight the virus that was created
• Having the body act as the attacker and defender sounds like auto immune disease
• Many adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are associated with the jab and this new technology

Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)

• Cellulitis
• Encephalitis
• Bell's Palsy
• Anaphylaxis resulting in death if not treat soon enough
• and more

Prevention

• Take off the effing mask, breathe in oxygen, and expel CO2, toxins, and waste products
• Exercise
• Get out in the sun or supplement with vitamin D
• Consider supplementing with quercetin and zinc
• Have meaningful and joyful in-person interactions with people that make you smile and laugh

If you have suggestions for bullet points or have good references (fact checkers need not apply) for existing bullet points, please leave them in the comments.

References:

1. https:https://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/frequently_asked_questions/pandemic/en///www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/frequently_asked_questions/pandemic/en/
2. https://www.vaccinationdecisions.net/how-the-world-health-organisation-who-created-a-pandemic-of-a-disease/

What is the Purpose of the Dystopian Conditioning?

So,

My son recently had a lacrosse tournament and there were some weird conditions put into place for spectators due to the C1984 virus bogeyman. 

First, I had to answer an online questionnaire asking if I had C1984, had traveled outside the United States, or had come into contact with someone who had C1984.  First of all, the answer to these questions, regardless of reality, is "No".  At least, if you want to watch your kid play in the tournament, that's how you answer.  In reality, the answer to the last question is either "probably" or "how the hell should I know".  I gave that second answer at the local hospital when I was going in for some physical therapy and they let me in.  It's a stupid question and you're an idiot if you say yes.  "Probably" is most likely to be the true answer, since everyone and their dog has been exposed at this point but if there is one thing we have learned through all of this, the truth is not important.  When I got to the tournament, there was no Checkpoint Charlie where some assigned Gestapo agent verified that people had completed the questionnaire.  We were supposed to submit the questionnaire both days of the tournament but since no one was actually checking if I had, I didn't bother the second day.

Second, there was a stated mandate that masks were going to be required.  This mandate was not actually being enforced at the tournament.  About 25% of the spectators were wearing masks over their mouth and most of those also had their nose covered.  About 25% were wearing their masks around their neck, either to be ready if confronted by mask Nazis or possibly they had been wearing them until they saw most people weren't and pulled them down around their neck.  The rest of us had our masks in our pocket.

Did I mention that we were outdoors and the temperature was in the 90s and there was a 10 - 15 mph wind and that everyone and their dog has been exposed to the virus?  On top of that, the questionnaire is absolutely pointless and we now know that the masks people are wearing are statistically insignificant at preventing an aerosoled virus, which is one of the traits of C1984.  We also know that with such a virus, a physical distancing of 6 feet might work at a lacrosse tournament but is totally pointless indoors where the recommendation is 27 feet in a well ventilated room.  So, the questionnaire, the masks, and the physical distancing rules that we are being bombarded with 24/7 are meaningless in terms of our health.

A patient asked my doctor when all the C1984 madness was going to end.  He said that he didn't know because it wasn't a medical decision but a political one.  None of these rules have any bearing on us from a medical standpoint and all effects on human health has been negative.  

Masks decrease oxygen intake and increase CO2 intake to the point where people are suffering from lethargy, headaches, nausea, and unconsciousness.  If the health departments, who are recommending the practice, which is useless at best and unhealthy at worst, were to find the same level of gasses in the air at a WalMart, they would shut down the store until adequate ventilation and/or canaries had been installed.  Hell, even Dr. Falsey and the surgeon general have said that masks won't help and aren't necessary and they are usually on the side tried to generate panic over this thing.

The physical distancing, especially lock downs, is wreaking havoc on the well being of humans, who are social beings and who need jobs in order to live in today's world.  The rate of suicide, drug overdoses, and deaths that could have been prevented by early detection but weren't because people can't or won't go to the doctor are all skyrocketing.  Unemployment and homelessness are on the rise and deaths from this political ploy will far exceed any deaths that occur during flu season.  Some people say that the "cure" is worse than the disease but this isn't a cure.  You can't cure a cold.  It's not even prevention.  It's something else.

And that brings me to my question for you all.  We now know that none of these draconian measures are aimed at curing or preventing a seasonal disease that has been a part of human history ever since there have been humans.  In fact, the number of deaths in the 2019-2010 flu season isn't even close to the worst ever or even the worst in the last 5 years.  According to CDC numbers, the total number of deaths was completely typical for winter in the United States.  Things didn't go berserk until the draconian measures were put into place, especially in the states where governors wouldn't allow sick people to go to the hospital but decided to house them with the most vulnerable population on the planet.

We know that if you are under 75 years old, the odds of being killed by this virus are less than dying in a car crash or from slipping in the shower or being attacked by a shark (which is saying something for those of us that don't live near an ocean) and yet, businesses are still closed, people are still being locked down, and my wife and I have to alternate which one of us gets to watch our son play lacrosse.

The question is: why are these rules in place?  Why did a take a questionnaire that no one is going to verify and that I can just lie about anyway.  Why do I carry my mask to the grocery store, put it on at the door, pull it down around my neck once I'm inside, and take it off as I'm walking out?  Why am I not allowed to high five a fellow disc golfer who just made a hole in one?

I have some theories but I'm interested in hearing what you all think.  What are we being conditioned for?  What is coming in the future that will be adopted more readily by a populace that has been repressed to the point where suicide and alcohol/drug abuse seem like the best alternatives?