Success Warrior: The Blog That Embraces ADHD

NOW DC Should Be Seen and Not Heard

So,

Occupy Wall Street never stopped and is picking up steam again as we head into spring.  The group that will be occupying DC may be adopting a new name, National Occupation of Washington DC or NOW DC.  I believe there is supposed to be some big kick off event at the end of March.

Here's a weird coincidence in timing.  Guess what's about to become a new law?  Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011.

Well that sounds like a good cause.

Just remember that laws are named opposite of their intention**.

This law to improve buildings and grounds doesn't do anything at all to improve buildings and grounds in the way that the 99% would think of as an improvement.  If you are one of the puppets for the 1% though, this is going to be a vast improvement.  Here's what the law will do after President FuckTheConstitution signs it:

You will no longer be allowed to protest in proximity to anyone who is being guarded by the SS.

This obviously applies to the White House . . .

. . . but wait, there's more.

Act now.  Callers are standing by.

It applies to anyone that has Secret Service protection and applies to temporary sites of that person.  Obviously, no more mic checks at one of the Great and Powerful Oz's "I'm so full of shit" speeches but maybe not so obviously:

• Mittler Romney has had SS protection for some time now - no more glitter bombs
• Rick inSanitorum has recently started getting SS protection
• Foreign dignitaries are routinely guarded by the SS
• The G8 Summit in Chicago - fogedaboudit
• The Republican National Convention - the Ron Paul Revolution will be federally charged
• Even the Superbowl is guarded by the SS

After NDAA, striking down the First Amendment isn't shocking and it's actually quite a tribute to how effective Occupy Wall Street has been.  This is a sign of fear from the puppets.  They want to sit in their big white domed buildings pissing on the 99% and they don't want to hear any complaining about it.  They don't want people confronting them with their lies and corruption.  They want people to play within the ever-increading rules of the system that they control because they know that anyone dumb enough to try to change the system from within the system is easy to control and anyone daring enough to challenge the system is a threat. 

Sit down and shut up!

You should run for Congress.

I'm sure that Obama will regretfully sign the bill into law and maybe even jot down a signing statement saying that he doesn't think that this bill is right but he's really got no choice in the matter.  After all, the people voted for these lawmakers who are acting as representatives of the people and the vote was 388 for and only 3 against so it is the will of the people that they not be allowed to voice their displeasure with their representatives.  And even if Obama wanted to veto this and I'm sure that he does because he cares so deeply about the American people and he is well versed in Constitutional Law, the cult member apologists will surely point out that with a vote of 388 to 3, any veto from the well-meaning puppet-in-chief would just get over-ridden anyway.  And so, sadly and with a heavy heart, Goldman Sachs' MVP will sign this into law and continue on his path to destroy any trace of freedom in the United States of America. 

We're going to have to change the national anthem about "land of the free".

You're an idiot!  They'll pass a law making it mandatory that everyone sing it.

And smile.

** Update: I ran across a video today that fits perfectly with the statement made by one of the voices in my head.  The topic of the video is what the GOP primary actually looks like compared to what is being reported in the news.  It's the last quote from Ron Paul that fits today's post:

Disturbing

So,

I've got my beliefs post on the backburner and I've got an idea for another post especially for the cult members dancing around in my mind taunting me and I just don't have the time tonight to get to either one. 

I'll be happy when college is over.  Almost as happy as I am that I have never had to pee in this bathroom.

Occupy Drones

So,

Drones are going to end up being mainstream in the near future in the skies of the United States.  It's been mentioned several times and I saw another article about it again today.  I'm not going to cover it much because it's crappy weather and Trey and I are going to see if we can draw superheroes.  Last time we did Pokemon characters.  Today, I'm going for Spiderman or Wolverine.  It may take a great deal of imagination to see which one it is, like looking at shapes of clouds.

Anyway, Occupy Wall Street is also going to use drones so they can get their cameras closer to the action.  The ones that I read about will be made from toy helicopters.

What do you think the response will be?

 

7th Day; 7 Words

Can't remember why I have this pic.

Leave your seven words in the comments.

Saturday Video: Alarmageddon

Mitt Romney Unveils His Economic Strategy

So,

Good ole Mittler is in Michigan trying to fool the people into voting for him.  He has taken some heat during the campaign for not being more specific (or specific at all really or even not quite so vague would be nice) about his plans to turn the economy around.  Mitt finally came forward with his plan.  Here's a video of Mitt's plan:

Resisting Indefinite Detention

So,

The Virginia State Legislature has passed an interesting new law in response to the NDAA giving the president the "legal authority" to kidnap people and detain them for pissing off the 1% without ever filing any criminal charges against them.  NDAA is such a blatant violation of the Bill of Rights that I've seen NDAA reported as the law that repealed the Bill of Rights.  The Great and Powerful Oz has secured his place in future history books by undoing such a critical element in the foundation of the United States of America.

It shows too as the states become less and less united.

He needs four more years to finish the job.

His re-inauguration could be National Secession Day.

Virginia, while not able to directly void the unconstitutional law (which means that it's already null and void and will just be enforced through the use of overwhelming violence), did what they consider to be the next best thing.

They moved the state to Canada?

Canada's no better, eh.

Did you hear that Canada is going to build a military base in Germany?

Focus!

Stay with us SW.

Virginia passed a law making it illegal for anyone who pulls a paycheck from the State of Virginia to assist the federal government, in any way, with the unlawful detention of a Virginia citizen in violation of the Virginia Constitution.  Obama may have tossed the US Constitution in the crapper but Virginia looks to be holding on to theirs, at least in this instance, and are holding it as preeminent to the kidnapping sections of NDAA.

Virginia's actions are important and play into the post on beliefs that I am hoping to write in the near future.  I'm afraid that said post might be time consuming and I have homework to do.  However, if I can get caught up, it will be next on the to-do list.

And while Virginia's new law is important and many are applauding it, I'm going to have to give it a golf clap when it comes to the directions given to the men and women of Virginia who have sworn an oath to protect and serve the citizen's of Virginia and uphold the Constitution.  Do you know how frustrating it is for cops when someone could help but instead they chose to "not get involved"?  How much more frustrating is it going to be when the goon squad starts kidnapping people and it's the police who don't want to get involved.  It's like passing a law saying that cops aren't allowed to help murderers.  First, you shouldn't have to pass such a law in the first place.  Second, umm, hello?

It is a start though and there will be more state and local governments in the future that do the same thing.  It may seem like irony but I think it's more about how humans are programmed.  The more that the 1% try to control everything that people do, the more chaotic things are going to get.

Humans were not meant to be kept in cages.

Greece Fired

So,

It's looks like the EU bank is looking burn Greece right to the ground. 

"Salary cutbacks (called "unified payroll") for contract workers at the public sector set to be finalized today. Cuts to be valid retroactively since november 2011. Expected result: Up to 64.000 people will work without salary this month, or even be asked to return money. Amongst them 21.000 teachers, 13.000 municipal employees and 30.000 civil servants."

The people of Greece should give the EU the finger, go back the drachma, and fix things on their own terms instead of letting some outside troika hell bent on the destruction of the people send in a list of impossible demands for yet another bailout this is going to fail in the end. 

Hanging Bankers

So,

Ken Livingstone, the homophobic tart and London mayoral candidate, made the news today by announcing a new plan to fix the economic problems of the world.  That plan is to hang a banker each week until the remaining bankers figure it out and bring themselves into line.  This plan is likely to have some appeal (hopefully not enough to get him the job) but it fails on so many levels that I'm having a hard time deciding where to start.

First, the fact that Livingstone, the closet fag, is so openly anti-gay means that he should not be allowed to be in charge of a city, or a church choir, or a family, or even be allowed out in the public without a shock collar.  Worse yet is the fact that he gets press coverage for this shit (gay bashing not hanging bankers).  It's unfortunate that the press-titutes publish this stuff.  They are so hard up for ratings or in favor of gay bashing that they actually give this shitbag press time.  People like this should get a media blackout that would make Ron Paul look like a rockstar.

Okay, all of that had nothing to do with the problem with Livingstone's comments but I am sick unto death of people, especially power hungry bitches, attacking gay people.  It makes me understand why people might nod their heads at his hanging bankers comment because quite frankly, wrong as it might be, it would be quite enjoyable to kick Livingstone as hard as I can in the balls.  He'd need a tonsillectomy to get them removed.

However <deep breath>,

That's not the solution and neither is hanging bankers.  Like Livingstone, bankers may be maggots but what makes them dangerous is the ability to wield the violence of the government.  Without the government, the "too big to fail" would have failed long ago, oil companies would be dinosaurs, Livingstone would never have a single comment repeated by the media, and gay people could marry anyone that they wanted to.

When you give one group of people the power to wield an ungawdly amount of violence and another group of people more money than gawd, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what kind of barter system is going to to be set up.  It's something that hanging bankers is not going to fix.  Next you'd have to hang owners of big oil, big pharma, big agriculture, and big whatever comes next. 

I don't think that Livingstone is smart enough to know what he's doing so it's probably completely accidental that he's throwing the red herring.  He's just trying to use a ploy to get himself into office where he can lord over young male interns under his desk. 

Occupy Wall Street is making the same mistake.  They are mad because the rich can use money to buy politicians completely undermining any idea of a representative republic for the people by the people.  Money is the vote.  Lobbyists write the laws and law makers don't actually read the laws.  They just vote what it says on the memo line on the bribery check.  OWS wants, like so many people, to get the money out of politics.  First, that's the wrong part of the equation to be looking at and second, it's just plain impossible. 

Who is going to pass a law saying that politicians can't accept money?  The law makers?  Shah, as if.  If the law was passed, who would enforce it?  People appointed by the law makers?  That would be effective.

I stand with OWS against people being able to purchase the capacity for violence from the government but the key isn't in hanging bankers.  It's in teaching people that the government does not have the legitimate right to initiate the use of force against people.  It's in showing that the immorality in the situation isn't in renting the initiation of force, it is the initiation of force.   It's the people who rob, steal, taze, pepperspray, kettle, kill, kidnap, rape, and do it all under "the color of law".  All of the "legal" immoral actions taken against the people, that's the real problem. 

Education is key also because education isn't violence.  Violence is not the solution.  Hanging bankers or burning down buildings is not going to solve the problem.  Best case scenario for those people thinking that a violent revolution is the answer is that this batch of immoral thugs will be replaced with another set of immoral thugs.  Things might be better for a while but in today's fast-paced world, the money would find it's way back into the system within a couple of election cycles.  That's how the game works.  Unlimited power + unlimited money = unlimited corruption. 

The true problem is the belief system and when that changes, everything else will change with it.  When the belief system changes, the government will not have enough violence to stop the change.  Respect for the government is already a thing of the past.  In its place is fear.  When fear passes, we will enter the next step for the human race.

. . . to be continued.

Ron Paul in the Maine Event

So,

Mitt Romney has been a bad girl.

And he is still is.

And he always will be.

It's been difficult to track down the truth on this and my search keyword list is getting incredibly long.

Like my Johnson.

Is it distinguished too?

If you want to find answers, actual honest to goodness answers, you need to enter in a whole list of keywords to weed out the bullshit: -cnn, -google, -msnbc, -cbs, -yahoo.  Oddly enough, I didn't have to enter "-fox".  Are they still doing a media blackout of Ron Paul? 

Is that why they kicked Judge Napolitano off the air?

Too much talk of freedom and talking to Ron Paul will end a lamestream media career.

I don't do all my searches like this because at least half of my blog is composed of posts mocking the lamestream media.  That requires that I put on the waders and step into the compost pile.  When it comes to looking for information on Ron Paul, heavy filtering is necessary because now that he's gotten so hard to ignore, the usual suspects just put out misinformation on him. 

For instance, our bad girl Romney has supposedly won Maine.

Define "won".

Won - Having your corporate friends put out news articles declaring you got the most votes regardless of actual vote counts (if any).

This may only be true if you discount any shenanigans plus all the votes knowingly not counted.  Grudgingly, there have been some articles stating that Ron Paul did win one county.  Several counties had zero voters according to GOP records. 

Did they have the caucus during Glee air time?

What is Glee? 

My guess is that Ron Paul won Maine, at least in terms of delegates.

This creates a bit of a dilemma that I would really like to dive into in some depth and that means that I won't be able to do it tonight.  I will put a teaser question to see what all of you think on this subject.

Obviously, trying to change a corrupt system from within that same corrupt system doesn't work.  Ron Paul's Revolution video caucuses, take pictures of vote tallies, and put all the information online to "keep the system honest".  Ron Paul won Nevada in 2008 and the RNC tossed all the vote tallies into a safe in a casino and submitted McCain supporters as delegates.  They didn't even try to be sneaky about it. 

So here's the question:

If you can't change the system from within the system, how do you change the system?