Condoleeza defended the attempt to get congress to pay for the retrofitting of the B2 and the manufacturing of 30,000 pound "bunker buster" bombs by saying that Iran is stubborn and might not listen to the world controlling United States like they are supposed to. If they don't do what they are told, we need to be prepared to bomb the hell out of them.
I understand her position because, after all, Iran has oil and we want it is trying to go nuclear.
Here's where I get concerned (besides the fact that we are willing to kill people - theirs and ours - to get oil):
If you believe that we are on the downside of the Peak Oil curve, it's time to start looking for new sources of energy. One of those sources is going to be nuclear.
Are we going to threaten to blow up any country that tries to use nuclear energy as an alternative to oil? Or just the ones that happen to be sitting on oil fields?
If we are afraid that they will use the enriched uranium for weapons instead of for electricity and those weapons might be used against us, should we keep pissing them off? Are we going to be able to stop them from creating weapons for the rest of time?
What if our impending economic collapse and China's surging economy change who the world's "Daddy" is? Should we attack China now to keep that from happening? They did try to poison all of our kids with lead, didn't they? That should be a good enough reason to go to war under the current administration.
"Shei shi ba?"
(That might not translate right. My Chinese is almost as bad as Bush's English.)










Recent Comments