As promised, and without any other introduction, here are my answers to this meme:
#1 - The Iraq War, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia, China, and anyone else that the US is about to attack
Just about everyone acknowledges that we were lied to in order to gain support for Bush to illegally attack Iraq. Caught up in the 9/11 furor, we allowed it to happen. Realizing now that the whole war is built upon gaining control of oil in the Middle East (unfortunately not for us but so that oil companies can get 12% off of all Iraq oil sold around the world), 70% of Americans want us to get out. We have said so. We have voted so.
The response, instead of the requested withdrawal, has been to put us on the verge of war with Iran. This time though, it doesn't look like the world is going to let us just walk in and try to seize someone else's country. The lie being told to us this time is that we are trying to stop Iran from getting a nuclear missile. To do this, we are willing to challenge Russia and China. Isn't there anyone in Bush's administration smart enough to pass on a little tip to Neo-Napoleon?
"Pssst. Mr. President, China and Russia *do* have nuclear missiles. Maybe we shouldn't piss them off."
We don't have the manpower to control Iraq so how are we going to control Iran too? A draft? No. We've been assured by the candidates that there won't be a draft and yet the Universal National Service Act (a fancy name for draft) was submitted again this year. The beautiful thing about the UNS is that it conscripts people into government service but not necessarily into the military. So while you and I (because they can take people up 42 years old) will be over in Iran killing people that are trying to defend their country, the sons and daughters of politicians and the rich will be helping disaster victims in California. How cool is that?
Ron Paul wants to pull our troops out of Iraq and doesn't want to go to war with Iran. He points out, quite rightly, that there are lots of people that have nuclear missiles. We don't attack them all (yet). It's obvious that the nuclear threat is a cover for what W really wants. Ron Paul also points out that the people in the Middle East wouldn't be so pissed at us if we would just come home and let them sort out their own problems. Our president is sacrificing the lives of Americans so that a few people can go from being filthy, stinking rich, to being filthy, stinking rich beyond what the mind can comprehend. Can you imagine the amount of money that 12% of all Middle East oil sold would amount to? Neither can I? Trillions per year. I can't even fathom what a trillion dollars looks like. Is it worth sacrificing 5,000 soldiers so far and many, many more than that if we invade Iran? Ron Paul says no and I happen to agree with him.
I threw Pakistan in there, not because we are going to war with them (yet), but because it shows the hypocrisy of the current administration. We are supposedly in the Middle East not to defend ourselves (well, except now we are again from Iran - you know, which ever excuse is handy) but to "spread democracy" and yet we are sending billions of dollars to support a military dictator who has just seized control of the country.
Ron Paul would stop sending money to Musharraf.
Money that we don't have, by the way, and that brings up the next point.